On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:55:45PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> > The idle-exit code assumes that if Timebase is not lost, then neither
> > are the per-core hypervisor resources lost.
>
> Double n
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
> The idle-exit code assumes that if Timebase is not lost, then neither
> are the per-core hypervisor resources lost.
Double negative! How about:
The idle-exit code assumes that if the timebase is restor
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
The idle-exit code assumes that if Timebase is not lost, then neither
are the per-core hypervisor resources lost. This was true on POWER8
where fast-sleep lost only TB but not per-core resources, and winkle
lost both.
This assumption is not true for POWER9 however, sinc
