Re: [PATCH 2/5] ibmebus: Remove bus match/probe/remove functions

2007-09-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Joachim Fenkes wrote: > Remove old code that will be replaced by rewritten and shorter functions in > the next patch. Keep struct ibmebus_dev and struct ibmebus_driver for now, > but replace ibmebus_{,un}register_driver() by dummy functions. This way, the > kernel wi

[PATCH 2/5] ibmebus: Remove bus match/probe/remove functions

2007-09-26 Thread Joachim Fenkes
Remove old code that will be replaced by rewritten and shorter functions in the next patch. Keep struct ibmebus_dev and struct ibmebus_driver for now, but replace ibmebus_{,un}register_driver() by dummy functions. This way, the kernel will still compile and run during the transition and git bisect

Re: [PATCH 2/5] ibmebus: Remove bus match/probe/remove functions

2007-09-26 Thread Joachim Fenkes
Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25.09.2007 16:29:51: > The description makes it sound like a git-bisect would get broken > by this patch, which should never happen. If the patch indeed > ends up with a broken kernel, it would be better to merge it with > the later patch that fixes the c

Re: [PATCH 2/5] ibmebus: Remove bus match/probe/remove functions

2007-09-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Joachim Fenkes wrote: > ibmebus_{,un}register_driver() are replaced by dummy functions because > ibmebus is temporarily unusable in this transitional state. > > Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- >  arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c |  199 > ++--

[PATCH 2/5] ibmebus: Remove bus match/probe/remove functions

2007-09-25 Thread Joachim Fenkes
ibmebus_{,un}register_driver() are replaced by dummy functions because ibmebus is temporarily unusable in this transitional state. Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/ibmebus.c | 199 ++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+)