On 2017/09/14 02:45AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:08:07 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
>
> > On 2017/09/13 04:53PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:50:33 +0530
> > > "Naveen N. Rao"
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:08:07 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> On 2017/09/13 04:53PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:50:33 +0530
> > "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, we disable instruction emulation
On 2017/09/13 04:53PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:50:33 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
>
> > Currently, we disable instruction emulation if emulate_step() fails for
> > any reason. However, such failures could be transient and specific to a
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 02:50:33 +0530
"Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> Currently, we disable instruction emulation if emulate_step() fails for
> any reason. However, such failures could be transient and specific to a
> particular run. Instead, only disable instruction
Currently, we disable instruction emulation if emulate_step() fails for
any reason. However, such failures could be transient and specific to a
particular run. Instead, only disable instruction emulation if we have
never been able to emulate this. If we had emulated this instruction
successfully