On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
this is done a second time in
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:51:02PM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:08:17AM +, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
enabling FIQs has nothing to do with