On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> I think this patch was mistakenly sent by Richard Zhu. It is already
> part of mainline since 3.12:
Explains the deja vue ...
Ralf
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.oz
Dear Ralf Baechle,
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:39:33 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
>
> Looking good,
>
> Acked-by: Ralf Baechle
I think this patch was mistakenly sent by Richard Zhu. It is already
part of mainline since 3.12:
http://git.ke
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
Looking good,
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle
Nevertheless I'd again like to express that I'm not that fond of of the
increasing number of weak functions in the kernel. In the old days
things were such that when an a platform didn't provice a
Zhu Richard-R65037 would like to recall the message, "[PATCH 24/34] PCI: use
weak functions for MSI arch-specific functions".
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
From: Thomas Petazzoni
Until now, the MSI architecture-specific functions could be overloaded
using a fairly complex set of #define and compile-time
conditionals. In order to prepare for the introduction of the msi_chip
infrastructure, it is desirable to switch all those functions to use
the 'wea
