On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:31:03AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Hello David, thanks for commenting.
>
> On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 10:45 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > @@ -805,6 +808,10 @@ static int resize_hpt_for_hotplug(unsigned long
> > > new_mem_size, bool shrinking)
> > > if (shrinking) {
>
Hello David, thanks for commenting.
On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 10:45 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > @@ -805,6 +808,10 @@ static int resize_hpt_for_hotplug(unsigned long
> > new_mem_size, bool shrinking)
> > if (shrinking) {
> >
> > + /* When batch removing entries, only resizes HPT at t
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 04:29:41AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> During memory hotunplug, after each LMB is removed, the HPT may be
> resized-down if it would map a max of 4 times the current amount of memory.
> (2 shifts, due to introduced histeresis)
>
> It usually is not an issue, but it can ta
During memory hotunplug, after each LMB is removed, the HPT may be
resized-down if it would map a max of 4 times the current amount of memory.
(2 shifts, due to introduced histeresis)
It usually is not an issue, but it can take a lot of time if HPT
resizing-down fails. This happens because resize
