On Aug 9, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 8, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
This patch adds a fault handler that responds to illegal Coprocessor
types. Currently all CTs are treated and illegal. There are two ways
to report the fault back to the application. If the
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 00:26 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
+ /* Some implementations leave us a hint for the CT */
+ ct = ICSWX_GET_CT_HINT(error_code);
+ if (ct 0) {
+ /* we have to peek at the instruction work to figure out CT */
+ union cop_ccw ccw;
don't use
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 00:26 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
+ /* Some implementations leave us a hint for the CT */
+ ct = ICSWX_GET_CT_HINT(error_code);
+ if (ct 0) {
+ /* we have to peek at the instruction work to
This patch adds a fault handler that responds to illegal Coprocessor
types. Currently all CTs are treated and illegal. There are two ways
to report the fault back to the application. If the application used
the record form (icswx.) then the architected reject is emulated.
If the application did
On Aug 8, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
This patch adds a fault handler that responds to illegal Coprocessor
types. Currently all CTs are treated and illegal. There are two ways
to report the fault back to the application. If the application used
the record form (icswx.) then the
