On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:31:57 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:50:45 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:04:10PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:31:57 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:50:45 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
Currently, of_platform_bus_probe() completely skips nodes which do not
explicitly match the 'matches' table passed in. Or, if the root node
matches, then it registers all the children unconditionally. However,
there are situations,
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:50:45 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
Currently, of_platform_bus_probe() completely skips nodes which do not
explicitly match the 'matches' table passed in. Or, if the root node
matches,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:50:45 +0800, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
Currently, of_platform_bus_probe() completely skips nodes which do not
explicitly match
Currently, of_platform_bus_probe() completely skips nodes which do not
explicitly match the 'matches' table passed in. Or, if the root node
matches, then it registers all the children unconditionally. However,
there are situations, such as registering devices from the root node,
when it is
