Re: [PATCH 32/41] mm: prevent userfaults to be handled under per-vma lock

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:36 PM Jann Horn wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:51 PM Jann Horn wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:55 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > Due to the possibility of handle_userfault dropping mmap_lock, avoid fault > > > handling under VMA lock and retry holding

Re: [PATCH 32/41] mm: prevent userfaults to be handled under per-vma lock

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 8:51 PM Jann Horn wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:55 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > Due to the possibility of handle_userfault dropping mmap_lock, avoid fault > > handling under VMA lock and retry holding mmap_lock. This can be handled > > more gracefully in the

Re: [PATCH 32/41] mm: prevent userfaults to be handled under per-vma lock

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:55 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > Due to the possibility of handle_userfault dropping mmap_lock, avoid fault > handling under VMA lock and retry holding mmap_lock. This can be handled > more gracefully in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > Suggested-by:

[PATCH 32/41] mm: prevent userfaults to be handled under per-vma lock

Due to the possibility of handle_userfault dropping mmap_lock, avoid fault handling under VMA lock and retry holding mmap_lock. This can be handled more gracefully in the future. Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan Suggested-by: Peter Xu --- mm/memory.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7