Also:
- rename fsl_spi to fsl,spi;
- add and use cell-index property, if found;
- split probing code out of fsl_spi_init, thus we can call
it for legacy device_type probing and new compatible probing.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton
Also:
- rename fsl_spi to fsl,spi;
- add and use cell-index property, if found;
- split probing code out of fsl_spi_init, thus we can call
it for legacy device_type probing and new compatible probing.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton
Also rename fsl_spi to fsl,spi.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts|3 +--
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc832x_mds.dts|6 ++
On Dec 19, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Also rename fsl_spi to fsl,spi.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts|3 +--
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:54:09PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Also rename fsl_spi to fsl,spi.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
index 3cf84d0..91bac51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ int __init fsl_spi_init(struct spi_board_info
*board_infos,
}
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:04:51PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
index 3cf84d0..91bac51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ int
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I though about it. Is your device tree source out of tree? Otherwise
it should be trivial to upgrade the dtb, instead of producing cruft in
the kernel. I vote for less legacy code, but lets see what others will
say. So far count is 1:1. ;-)
I just want a transition
On 12/19/07, Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:04:51PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
index 3cf84d0..91bac51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c
+++
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:12:50AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I though about it. Is your device tree source out of tree? Otherwise
it should be trivial to upgrade the dtb, instead of producing cruft in
the kernel. I vote for less legacy code, but lets see what others will
say. So far count
10 matches
Mail list logo