On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:51:43 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
> > Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 16
On Jul 17, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
use GFP
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:14 -0500
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >>
> >>> use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use a
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating
submit_count.
why?
You mean why are atomics required? Yes that is a goo
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:33:45PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> >use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating
> >submit_count.
>
> why?
You mean why are atomics required? Yes that is a good question.
Kim?
Cheers,
--
Visit
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating
submit_count.
why?
- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
use GFP_ATOMIC when necessary; use atomic_t when allocating submit_count.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Lee Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/crypto/talitos.c |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos.c b/
