On Monday 23 April 2012 03:09:01 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
>dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
>task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
that isn't a problem for this code as it specificall
The patch fixes two problems:
1. Working with task->mm w/o getting mm or grabing the task lock is
dangerous as ->mm might disappear (exit_mm() assigns NULL under
task_lock(), so tasklist lock is not enough).
We can't use get_task_mm()/mmput() pair as mmput() might sleep,
so we have to
