Hello Kumar,
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:58:00 -0500
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:58:00PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
PCI/PCIe nodes, but
Which patch? Valentine's or mine under the subject? Don't know
about the
former, but mine patch is pretty obvious: your commit
5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c moved PCI nodes out of soc
node,
but you forgot to change regs = , thus instead of e000a000/
e0008000,
kernel used
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8568mds.dts |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-)
Of course. But shouldn't those be the subnoses of the soc type node?
I don't suppose the PCI controllers could hang off the root node...
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-)
Of course. But shouldn't those be the subnoses of the soc type node?
On Oct 5, 2007, at 1:05 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 09:56:46PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Commit 5bece127f0666996ca90772229e00332a34e516c tried to fix
PCI/PCIe nodes, but actually it broke them even harder. ;-)
Of course. But
