On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:42:01 +0530
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
Hey, thanks for the review.
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:23:49PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > If not all threads were in winkle, full state loss recovery is not
> > necessary and can be avoided. A previous patch remove
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:23:49PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> If not all threads were in winkle, full state loss recovery is not
> necessary and can be avoided. A previous patch removed this optimisation
> due to some complexity with the implementation. Re-implement it by
> counting
If not all threads were in winkle, full state loss recovery is not
necessary and can be avoided. A previous patch removed this optimisation
due to some complexity with the implementation. Re-implement it by
counting the number of threads in winkle with the per-core idle state.
Only restore full sta
