Le 03/10/2018 à 09:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :
On 28/09/2018 22:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
while it does not so let's remote it.
But it does use eg.
OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_SNOOP_ON
On 28/09/2018 22:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
>> The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
>> while it does not so let's remote it.
>
> But it does use eg.
>
> OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_SNOOP_ON
> OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_CAPI
>
> Which come fr
Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
> The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
> while it does not so let's remote it.
But it does use eg.
OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_SNOOP_ON
OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_CAPI
Which come from opal-api.h via opal.h.
So you should at least include opal-api
On 28/9/18 4:38 pm, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
while it does not so let's remote it.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Thanks for catching this
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan
---
drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 1 -
1 file ch
The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
while it does not so let's remote it.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
---
drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
index b66d832..8cbcbb7 1006
