On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:20 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> DaYu just reminded me that Michael already had a patch removing all the
> related code.
>
> Please ignore this patch..
Thanks for tracking down what the actual problem was.
cheers
___
Linuxppc-dev
DaYu just reminded me that Michael already had a patch removing all the
related code.
Please ignore this patch..
Thanks, Zhong
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:00 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> In commit 752a6422f, new stack frame is created for parameters.
>
> However, the r1 is added back a little earlier
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 12:00 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> In commit 752a6422f, new stack frame is created for parameters.
>
> However, the r1 is added back a little earlier, so r3 and r4 are
> restored from a wrong place, which could cause following error during
> boot:
Thanks ! However I've decided t
Hi Zhong,
I really need this patch :)
BTW, it seems that this bug just happens in 3.16-rc1 as I reported.
Thanks
Mike
On 06/25/2014 12:00 PM, Li Zhong wrote:
In commit 752a6422f, new stack frame is created for parameters.
However, the r1 is added back a little earlier, so r3 and r4 are
resto
In commit 752a6422f, new stack frame is created for parameters.
However, the r1 is added back a little earlier, so r3 and r4 are
restored from a wrong place, which could cause following error during
boot:
Querying for OPAL presence... there !
DEFAULT CATCH!, exception-handler=fff00700
at %SRR
