Dear Peter,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Wolfgang> NAK.
>
> Wolfgang> Please do not add such a patch to mainline.
>
> I agree that FIT images probably are the way to go for the future, but
> I do think there's room for uImage.% just like we have cuImage.% for
> really old ubo
> "Wolfgang" == Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> Support uImage., which are U-Boot multi component images
>> containing a kernel, dtb and possibly an initrd.
Wolfgang> NAK.
Wolfgang> Please do not add such a patch to mainline.
I agree that FIT images probably are the wa
Dear Peter Korsgaard,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> From: peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Support uImage., which are U-Boot multi component images
> containing a kernel, dtb and possibly an initrd.
NAK.
Please do not add such a patch to mainline.
> + uImage.%: U
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:50:10AM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> From: peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Support uImage., which are U-Boot multi component images
> containing a kernel, dtb and possibly an initrd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Grant Likel
> "Gerhard" == Gerhard Pircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> Support uImage., which are U-Boot multi component images
>> containing a kernel, dtb and possibly an initrd.
Gerhard> Just out of interest: Do you intend to replace the code for building
Gerhard> cuImage. (zImage target) wi
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:50:10 +0200
> Von: Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [PATCH v2] bootwrapper: support u-boot multi component images
> From: peter Korsga
From: peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Support uImage., which are U-Boot multi component images
containing a kernel, dtb and possibly an initrd.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
v2: Incorporated Grant Likely's feedback.
Documentation/powerpc/bootwrapper.txt |4
