On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:48:09AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:05:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >>Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Kumar,
>
> According to patchwork, this is now delegated
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:05:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:05:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
> >On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >>Kumar,
> >>
> >>According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
> >>have any objections to merge this?
> >
> >Would like Scott's Ack.
>
> I think
Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we need to save IACn, DACn, DBCRn, PID0, and USPRG0.
Might want to
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we need to save IACn, DACn, DBCRn, PID0, and USPRG0.
Might want to also save TLB1 con
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:20:23PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
> > Kumar,
> >
> > According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
> > have any objections to merge this?
>
> Would like Scott's Ack.
Cc'ing.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
L
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:38:02AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> This is started as swsusp_32.S modifications, but the amount of #ifdefs
>> made the whole file horribly unreadable, so let's put the support into
>> its own separate file.
>>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:38:02AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> This is started as swsusp_32.S modifications, but the amount of #ifdefs
> made the whole file horribly unreadable, so let's put the support into
> its own separate file.
>
> The code should be relatively easy to modify to support 4
This is started as swsusp_32.S modifications, but the amount of #ifdefs
made the whole file horribly unreadable, so let's put the support into
its own separate file.
The code should be relatively easy to modify to support 44x BookEs as
well, but since I don't have any 44x to test, let's confine th
