Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Fixes for lparstat boot reports

2024-05-03 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:50:45 +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > Currently lparstat reports which shows since LPAR boot are wrong for > some fields. There is a need for storing the PIC(Pool Idle Count) at > boot for accurate reporting. PATCH 1 Does that. > > While there, it was noticed that hcall retu

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Fixes for lparstat boot reports

2024-04-29 Thread Michael Ellerman
Shrikanth Hegde writes: > On 4/12/24 2:50 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: >> Currently lparstat reports which shows since LPAR boot are wrong for >> some fields. There is a need for storing the PIC(Pool Idle Count) at >> boot for accurate reporting. PATCH 1 Does that. >> >> While there, it was noticed

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Fixes for lparstat boot reports

2024-04-28 Thread Shrikanth Hegde
On 4/12/24 2:50 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > Currently lparstat reports which shows since LPAR boot are wrong for > some fields. There is a need for storing the PIC(Pool Idle Count) at > boot for accurate reporting. PATCH 1 Does that. > > While there, it was noticed that hcall return value is l

[PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/pseries: Fixes for lparstat boot reports

2024-04-12 Thread Shrikanth Hegde
Currently lparstat reports which shows since LPAR boot are wrong for some fields. There is a need for storing the PIC(Pool Idle Count) at boot for accurate reporting. PATCH 1 Does that. While there, it was noticed that hcall return value is long and both h_get_ppp and h_get_mpp could set the unini