> On 09-Apr-2022, at 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> Em Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:28:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:21:09PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
>>> The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll
>>> hits failure in
Em Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 12:28:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:21:09PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> > The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll
> > hits failure in system configuration with CPU's more than 1024.
> > These benchmarks use
Em Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:21:09PM +0530, Athira Rajeev escreveu:
> The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll
> hits failure in system configuration with CPU's more than 1024.
> These benchmarks uses "sched_getaffinity" and "sched_setaffinity"
> in the code to work with affinity.
A
> On 07-Apr-2022, at 6:05 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 10:51 AM Athira Rajeev
> wrote:
>>
>> The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll
>> hits failure in system configuration with CPU's more than 1024.
>> These benchmarks uses "sched_getaffinity" and "sche
The perf benchmark for collections: numa, futex and epoll
hits failure in system configuration with CPU's more than 1024.
These benchmarks uses "sched_getaffinity" and "sched_setaffinity"
in the code to work with affinity.
Example snippet from numa benchmark:
<<>>
perf: bench/numa.c:302: bind_to_n
