Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/hugetlb: Fix commandline parsing behavior for invalid hugepagesize

2016-03-23 Thread Vaishali Thakkar
On Wednesday 23 March 2016 07:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 23-03-16 17:37:18, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: >> Current code fails to ignore the 'hugepages=' parameters when unsupported >> hugepagesize is specified. With this patchset, introduce new architecture >> independent routine hugetlb_bad

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/hugetlb: Fix commandline parsing behavior for invalid hugepagesize

2016-03-23 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 23-03-16 17:37:18, Vaishali Thakkar wrote: > Current code fails to ignore the 'hugepages=' parameters when unsupported > hugepagesize is specified. With this patchset, introduce new architecture > independent routine hugetlb_bad_size to handle such command line options. > And then call it in

[PATCH v2 0/6] mm/hugetlb: Fix commandline parsing behavior for invalid hugepagesize

2016-03-23 Thread Vaishali Thakkar
Current code fails to ignore the 'hugepages=' parameters when unsupported hugepagesize is specified. With this patchset, introduce new architecture independent routine hugetlb_bad_size to handle such command line options. And then call it in architecture specific code. Changes since v1: -