On Saturday, January 11, 2014 01:37:29 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where
device-state_count is smaller than driver-state_count, unfortunately
On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where
device-state_count is smaller than driver-state_count, unfortunately
currently this is untrue (device-state_count is used only for handling
On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where
device-state_count is smaller than driver-state_count, unfortunately
currently this is untrue (device-state_count is used only for handling
Hi,
Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where
device-state_count is smaller than driver-state_count, unfortunately
currently this is untrue (device-state_count is used only for handling
cpuidle state sysfs entries and driver-state_count is used for all
other cases) and