On 16/08/21 16:03, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>
>> Your version is much much better than mine.
>> And I have verified that it works as expected.
>>
>>
>
> Hey Peter/Valentin
>
> Are we waiting for any more feedback/testing for this?
>
I'm not overly fond of that last one, but AFAICT the only
>
> Your version is much much better than mine.
> And I have verified that it works as expected.
>
>
Hey Peter/Valentin
Are we waiting for any more feedback/testing for this?
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
* Valentin Schneider [2021-08-09 13:52:38]:
> On 09/08/21 12:22, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Valentin Schneider [2021-08-08 16:56:47]:
> >> Wait, doesn't the distance matrix (without any offline node) say
> >>
> >> distance(0, 3) == 40
> >>
> >> ? We should have at the very least:
> >>
>
On 09/08/21 12:22, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Valentin Schneider [2021-08-08 16:56:47]:
>> Wait, doesn't the distance matrix (without any offline node) say
>>
>> distance(0, 3) == 40
>>
>> ? We should have at the very least:
>>
>> node 0 1 2 3
>> 0: 10 20 ?? 40
>> 1: 20
* Valentin Schneider [2021-08-08 16:56:47]:
>
> A bit late, but technically the week isn't over yet! :D
>
> On 23/07/21 20:09, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > * Valentin Schneider [2021-07-13 17:32:14]:
> >> Now, let's take examples from your cover letter:
> >>
> >> node distances:
> >> node
A bit late, but technically the week isn't over yet! :D
On 23/07/21 20:09, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Valentin Schneider [2021-07-13 17:32:14]:
>> Now, let's take examples from your cover letter:
>>
>> node distances:
>> node 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>> 0: 10 20 40 40 40
On 04/08/21 15:31, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Srikar Dronamraju [2021-07-23 20:09:14]:
>
>> * Valentin Schneider [2021-07-13 17:32:14]:
>>
>> > On 12/07/21 18:18, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> > > Hi Valentin,
>> > >
>> > >> On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> > >> > @@ -1891,12
* Srikar Dronamraju [2021-07-23 20:09:14]:
> * Valentin Schneider [2021-07-13 17:32:14]:
>
> > On 12/07/21 18:18, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > Hi Valentin,
> > >
> > >> On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > >> > @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
> > >> > void
* Valentin Schneider [2021-07-13 17:32:14]:
> On 12/07/21 18:18, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > Hi Valentin,
> >
> >> On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >> > @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
> >> > void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu)
> >> > {
> >
> >
On 12/07/21 18:18, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
>> On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>> > @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
>> > void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu)
>> > {
>>
>> Hmph, so we're playing games with masks of offline nodes - is
Hi Valentin,
> On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
> > void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
>
> Hmph, so we're playing games with masks of offline nodes - is that really
> necessary? Your modification of
On 01/07/21 09:45, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> @@ -1891,12 +1894,30 @@ void sched_init_numa(void)
> void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> - int i, j;
> + int i, j, empty;
>
> + empty =
Currently scheduler doesn't check if node is online before adding CPUs
to the node mask. However on some architectures, node distance is only
available for nodes that are online. Its not sure how much to rely on
the node distance, when one of the nodes is offline.
If said node distance is fake
13 matches
Mail list logo
