On 06/27/2014 07:08 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 10:36 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/26/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the
From: Denis Kirjanov k...@linux-powerpc.org
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:34:57 +0400
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
[
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
[ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
[
On 06/26/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[ 709.412245] ret
On 6/26/14, Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[
On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 10:36 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/26/2014 10:30 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 21:34 +0400, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[
We have to return the boolean here if the tag presents
or not, not just ANDing the TCI with the mask which results to:
[ 709.412097] test_bpf: #18 LD_VLAN_TAG_PRESENT
[ 709.412245] ret 4096 != 1
[ 709.412332] ret 4096 != 1
[ 709.412333] FAIL (2 times)
Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov