On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:14:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Looking into some cpuidle drivers for x86 I found at least one that
doesn't respect this convention. Damn.
Which one? We should probably fix it :-)
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
The core idle loop now takes care of it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre n...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
The core idle loop now takes care of it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre n...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
The core idle loop now takes care of it.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre n...@linaro.org
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@linaro.org
---
