Hi Ira, Thanks for reviewing this patch.
Ira Weiny writes:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:32:52PM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>
>> +/* Inject a smart error Add the dirty-shutdown-counter value to the pdsm */
>> +static int papr_pdsm_smart_inject(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
>> +
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:32:52PM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
[snip]
>
> +/* Inject a smart error Add the dirty-shutdown-counter value to the pdsm */
> +static int papr_pdsm_smart_inject(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
> + union nd_pdsm_payload *payload)
> +{
> + int r
Thanks for reviewing this patch Aneesh. My responses to your comments
below:
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> Vaibhav Jain writes:
>
>> Presently PAPR doesn't support injecting smart errors on an
>> NVDIMM. This makes testing the NVDIMM health reporting functionality
>> difficult as simulating NVDI
Vaibhav Jain writes:
> Presently PAPR doesn't support injecting smart errors on an
> NVDIMM. This makes testing the NVDIMM health reporting functionality
> difficult as simulating NVDIMM health related events need a hacked up
> qemu version.
>
> To solve this problem this patch proposes simulatin
Presently PAPR doesn't support injecting smart errors on an
NVDIMM. This makes testing the NVDIMM health reporting functionality
difficult as simulating NVDIMM health related events need a hacked up
qemu version.
To solve this problem this patch proposes simulating certain set of
NVDIMM health rel
