On 10.09.2014 [12:06:16 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:47:23 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
> wrote:
>
> > On 09.09.2014 [17:11:15 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:27 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Joonsoo Kim
> > > >
>
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:47:23 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
wrote:
> On 09.09.2014 [17:11:15 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:27 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Joonsoo Kim
> > >
> > > We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the
>
On 09.09.2014 [17:11:15 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:27 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
> wrote:
>
> > From: Joonsoo Kim
> >
> > We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the
> > allocation target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly
> >
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:27 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan
wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim
>
> We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the
> allocation target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly
> select the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab,
> b
From: Joonsoo Kim
We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the
allocation target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly
select the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab,
because of node mismatch. Introduced function, node_to_mem_node(X), will
retu
