Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

2019-07-19 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Lendacky, Thomas writes: > On 7/18/19 2:44 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> >> Lendacky, Thomas writes: >> >>> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: Hello, This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate patches, as suggested by Chri

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

2019-07-19 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 7/18/19 2:44 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Lendacky, Thomas writes: > >> On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate >>> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

2019-07-18 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Lendacky, Thomas writes: > On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate >> patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in >> patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCR

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

2019-07-18 Thread Lendacky, Thomas
On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Hello, > > This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate > patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in > patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by > Janani and

[PATCH v3 0/6] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers

2019-07-17 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello, This version is mostly about splitting up patch 2/3 into three separate patches, as suggested by Christoph Hellwig. Two other changes are a fix in patch 1 which wasn't selecting ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT for s390 spotted by Janani and removal of sme_active and sev_active symbol exports as sugges