On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 11:09:58AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 5:22 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:27:08 +0100 Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> > > > It sounds nice in theory. In practice. EXPERT hides too much. When you
> > > > flip expert, you expos
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 5:22 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:27:08 +0100 Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
>
> > > It sounds nice in theory. In practice. EXPERT hides too much. When you
> > > flip expert, you expose over a 175ish new config options which are
> > > hidden behind EXPERT.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:12 AM Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:05:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:27:08 +0100 Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> > > > It sounds nice in theory. In practice. EXPERT hides too much. When you
> > > > flip expert, you expo
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 03:05:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:27:08 +0100 Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > > It sounds nice in theory. In practice. EXPERT hides too much. When you
> > > flip expert, you expose over a 175ish new config options which are
> > > hidden behind EX
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:27:08 +0100 Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> > It sounds nice in theory. In practice. EXPERT hides too much. When you
> > flip expert, you expose over a 175ish new config options which are
> > hidden behind EXPERT. You don't have to know what you are doing just
> > with the MAX_O
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 06:50:01AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 2:22 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:55:37AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
> > > >
>
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 2:22 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:55:37AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
> > >
> > > It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memor
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:55:37AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
> >
> > It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
> > management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 1:09 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
>
> It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
> management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
> those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand
> i
On 2023/3/25 14:08, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand
implications of changi
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand
implications of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and
r
11 matches
Mail list logo
