Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame()

2020-03-05 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 11:51:37 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > current_stack_pointer(), which was called __get_SP(), used to just > return the value in r1. > > But that caused problems in some cases, so it was turned into a > function in commit bfe9a2cfe91a ("powerpc: Reimplement __get_SP() as a >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame()

2020-02-20 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 20/02/2020 à 12:51, Michael Ellerman a écrit : current_stack_pointer(), which was called __get_SP(), used to just return the value in r1. But that caused problems in some cases, so it was turned into a function in commit bfe9a2cfe91a ("powerpc: Reimplement __get_SP() as a function not a

[PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc: Rename current_stack_pointer() to current_stack_frame()

2020-02-20 Thread Michael Ellerman
current_stack_pointer(), which was called __get_SP(), used to just return the value in r1. But that caused problems in some cases, so it was turned into a function in commit bfe9a2cfe91a ("powerpc: Reimplement __get_SP() as a function not a define"). Because it's a function in a separate