On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 02:30:10PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Somebody also has to take a task and work very hard to get rid of
> __raw_writeX()
> APIs in drivers/net directory. It looked like a very common practice though
> it clearly violates multiarch portability concerns Jason and Deve
+linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
On 3/17/2018 11:05 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 12:25:14AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 3/17/2018 12:03 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> On 3/16/2018 11:40 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
I'll change writel_relaxed() with __raw_writel() in the series
On 3/16/18 6:04 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
Anybody understand why the PPC implementation of writeX_relaxed() isn't
relaxed?
You probably should ask that on the linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
mailing list.
I've always wondered why PowerPC has non-standard I/O accessors.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter
