Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On 07/30/2015 07:41 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Won't it fall through to the next

[PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka vba...@suse.cz Acked-by: David Rientjes rient...@google.com Acked-by: Mel

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:34:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Won't it fall through to the next closest memory node in the zonelist anyway? Is

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: use numa_mem_id() in alloc_pages_node()

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote: numa_mem_id() is able to handle allocation from CPUs on memory-less nodes, so it's a more robust fallback than the currently used numa_node_id(). Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka vba...@suse.cz