On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 02:44:31PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:17:23 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[...]
> > > Now what's the plan ?
> > > Andy, do you want to send a v2 of this patch or may I get the patch,
> > > modify it
> > > according to reviews already present in
Hi Andy, Yury,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:17:23 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[...]
> > Now what's the plan ?
> > Andy, do you want to send a v2 of this patch or may I get the patch, modify
> > it
> > according to reviews already present in v1 and integrate it in my current
> > series ?
>
> I
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:46:12PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:13:13 -0800
> Yury Norov wrote:
...
> > That's I agree. Scatter/gather from your last approach sound better.
> > Do you plan to send a v2?
See below.
...
> > I think your scatter/gather is better then this
Hi Andy, Yury,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:13:13 -0800
Yury Norov wrote:
...
>
> That's I agree. Scatter/gather from your last approach sound better.
> Do you plan to send a v2?
>
...
>
> I think your scatter/gather is better then this onto/off by naming and
> implementation. If you'll send a
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:20:22PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:01:38 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Agree, the bitmap_onto() code is simpler to understand than its help.
> >
> > I
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:20:22PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:01:38 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> Agree, the bitmap_onto() code is simpler to understand than its help.
>
> I introduced bitmap_off() to be the "reverse" bitmap_onto() operations
> and I preferred
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:01:38 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:27:16 +0200
> > Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:56:31AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > > Currently the bitmap_onto()
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:27:16 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:56:31AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > Currently the bitmap_onto() is available only for CONFIG_NUMA=y case,
> > > while some users may
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:27:16 +0200
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:56:31AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > Currently the bitmap_onto() is available only for CONFIG_NUMA=y case,
> > while some users may benefit out of it and being independent to NUMA
> > code.
> >
>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:56:31AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> Currently the bitmap_onto() is available only for CONFIG_NUMA=y case,
> while some users may benefit out of it and being independent to NUMA
> code.
>
> Make it available to users by moving out of ifdeffery and exporting for
>
Currently the bitmap_onto() is available only for CONFIG_NUMA=y case,
while some users may benefit out of it and being independent to NUMA
code.
Make it available to users by moving out of ifdeffery and exporting for
modules.
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina
---
lib/bitmap.c | 3 ++-
1 file
11 matches
Mail list logo
