Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:06 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:29:17 +0530 > "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > > > On 2016/02/15 04:07PM, Cyril Bur wrote: > > > Test that the non volatile floating point and Altivec registers get > > > correctly preserved

Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall

2016-02-15 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 2016/02/16 11:06AM, Cyril Bur wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:29:17 +0530 > "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > > > On 2016/02/15 04:07PM, Cyril Bur wrote: > > > Test that the non volatile floating point and Altivec registers get > > > correctly preserved across the

Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall

2016-02-15 Thread Cyril Bur
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:29:17 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > On 2016/02/15 04:07PM, Cyril Bur wrote: > > Test that the non volatile floating point and Altivec registers get > > correctly preserved across the fork() syscall. > > > > fork() works nicely for this

Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall

2016-02-15 Thread Naveen N. Rao
On 2016/02/15 04:07PM, Cyril Bur wrote: > Test that the non volatile floating point and Altivec registers get > correctly preserved across the fork() syscall. > > fork() works nicely for this purpose, the registers should be the same for > both parent and child > > Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur

[PATCH v4 1/9] selftests/powerpc: Test the preservation of FPU and VMX regs across syscall

2016-02-14 Thread Cyril Bur
Test that the non volatile floating point and Altivec registers get correctly preserved across the fork() syscall. fork() works nicely for this purpose, the registers should be the same for both parent and child Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur ---