Hi,
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 8:46 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > @@ -111,6 +125,11 @@ static void watchdog_hardlockup_interrupt_count(void)
> >
> > void watchdog_hardlockup_check(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > + if (__this_cpu_read(watchdog_hardlockup_touch)) {
> > +
On Thu 2023-05-04 15:13:42, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> In preparation for the buddy hardlockup detector, which wants the same
> petting logic as the current perf hardlockup detector, move the code
> to watchdog.c. While doing this, rename the global variable to match
> others nearby. The
In preparation for the buddy hardlockup detector, which wants the same
petting logic as the current perf hardlockup detector, move the code
to watchdog.c. While doing this, rename the global variable to match
others nearby. The arch_touch_nmi_watchdog() function is not renamed
since that is
