Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

2016-06-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:47:47PM +0800, xinhui wrote: > > > On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > >I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough... > > > sorry for noise. > In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is > changed by accident. > So I resen

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

2016-06-02 Thread Peter Zijlstra
I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough... ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

2016-06-02 Thread Pan Xinhui
change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!! cha

[PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

2016-06-02 Thread Pan Xinhui
change from v4: BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue. struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine. native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix it. sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!! cha

Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] powerPC/pSeries use pv-qpsinlock as the default spinlock implemention

2016-06-02 Thread xinhui
On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote: I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough... sorry for noise. In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed by accident. So I resend them just for sure. sorry again...