On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:48:25AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:03:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
As mach/hardware.h is deleted, we need to use platform_device_id to
differentiate SoCs. Besides, one
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:48:25AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:03:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
As mach/hardware.h is deleted, we need to use
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 05:28:30PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
trimming
From what I understand balbi's comment, he dislikes this full list of
device id. Instead, he prefers to something like below.
static const struct platform_device_id fsl_udc_devtype[] = {
{
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
As mach/hardware.h is deleted, we need to use platform_device_id to
differentiate SoCs. Besides, one cpu_is_mx35 is useless as it has
already used pdata to differentiate runtime
Meanwhile we update the platform code accordingly.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:03:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
As mach/hardware.h is deleted, we need to use platform_device_id to
differentiate SoCs. Besides, one cpu_is_mx35 is useless as it has
already used pdata to differentiate
As mach/hardware.h is deleted, we need to use platform_device_id to
differentiate SoCs. Besides, one cpu_is_mx35 is useless as it has
already used pdata to differentiate runtime
Meanwhile we update the platform code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen peter.c...@freescale.com
---
