Hi!
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:37:20PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:26:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> > Guenter Roeck writes:
> >> > > Ah, sorry. I was
On 5/20/21 4:38 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Guenter Roeck writes:
On 5/18/21 5:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
[ ... ]
That was the generic header change in the patch. I was commenting about the
ppc64 specific change causing build failures.
Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is vali
Guenter Roeck writes:
> On 5/18/21 5:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> [ ... ]
That was the generic header change in the patch. I was commenting about the
ppc64 specific change causing build failures.
>>>
>>> Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
>>>
>>> void f1()
>
Segher Boessenkool writes:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:26:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Guenter Roeck writes:
>> > > Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
>> > >
>> > > void f1()
>> > > {
>>
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:37:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 5/19/21 5:03 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >>And it actually explicitly is undefin
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:37:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/19/21 5:03 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>And it actually explicitly is undefined behaviour in C90 already
> >>(3.6.6.4 in C90, 6.8.6.4 in C99 and later).
On 5/19/21 5:03 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:26:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Guenter Roeck writes:
Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
void f1()
{
return f2()
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:14PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:26:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Guenter Roeck writes:
> > > Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
> > >
> > > void f1()
> > > {
> > > return f2();
> > >
On 5/18/21 5:26 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
[ ... ]
That was the generic header change in the patch. I was commenting about the
ppc64 specific change causing build failures.
Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
void f1()
{
return f2();
^^
}
as long as f
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:26:22AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Guenter Roeck writes:
> > Ah, sorry. I wasn't aware that the following is valid C code
> >
> > void f1()
> > {
> > return f2();
> > ^^
> > }
> >
> > as long as f2() is void as well. Confusing, but we live and learn.
Guenter Roeck writes:
> On 5/17/21 6:55 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck writes:
>>
>>> On 5/17/21 1:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
> extern vo
On 5/17/21 6:55 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Guenter Roeck writes:
On 5/17/21 1:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
...
extern void radix__local_flush_all_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
d
Guenter Roeck writes:
> On 5/17/21 1:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
...
>>> extern void radix__local_flush_all_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/as
On 5/17/21 1:40 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
No functional change in this patch
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
.../include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-radix.h | 19 +++-
ar
On 5/15/21 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
No functional change in this patch
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
.../include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-radix.h| 19 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h |
On 5/15/21 1:41 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 2021 09:35:25 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
#define __HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_PMD_TLB_RANGE
static inline void flush_pmd_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start
On Sat, 15 May 2021 09:35:25 -0700 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > #define __HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_PMD_TLB_RANGE
> > static inline void flush_pmd_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> >unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > +{
> > +
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:13:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> No functional change in this patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> ---
> .../include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-radix.h| 19 +++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h | 23 ---
> arch/powerpc
No functional change in this patch
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
.../include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-radix.h| 19 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush.h | 23 ---
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_hugetlbpage.c | 4 +--
arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_tlb.c
19 matches
Mail list logo
