Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
to system call, increasing the response time, vDSO implementation reduces
the cycle time. Below is a benchmark of the difference in execution times.
(Non-c
* Naveen N. Rao wrote (on 2017-10-11 07:04:43
+):
> Hi Santosh,
> This seems to have gone from v4 to v6 -- did I miss v5?
Nope, this is indeed v5, a typo :-(
>
> On 2017/10/10 11:10PM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> > Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
> > (CLOC
Hi Santosh,
This seems to have gone from v4 to v6 -- did I miss v5?
On 2017/10/10 11:10PM, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
> (CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
> to system call, increasing the resp
Current vDSO64 implementation does not have support for coarse clocks
(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, CLOCK_REALTIME_COARSE), for which it falls back
to system call, increasing the response time, vDSO implementation reduces
the cycle time. Below is a benchmark of the difference in execution times.
(Non-c