On (03/24/15 18:16), David Miller wrote:
Generally this looks fine to me.
But about patch #2, I see no reason to have multiple iommu_pool_hash
tables. Even from a purely sparc perspective, we can always just do
with just one of them.
Furthermore, you can even probably move it down into
From: Sowmini Varadhan sowmini.varad...@oracle.com
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:10:27 -0400
Deltas from patchv5:
- removed iommu_tbl_ops, and instead pass the -flush_all as
an indirection to iommu_tbl_pool_init()
- only invoke -flush_all when there is no large_pool, based on
the assumption
Deltas from patchv5:
- removed iommu_tbl_ops, and instead pass the -flush_all as
an indirection to iommu_tbl_pool_init()
- only invoke -flush_all when there is no large_pool, based on
the assumption that large-pool usage is infrequently encountered.
Sowmini (2):
Break up monolithic iommu
