Re: [PATCH v6 resend 9/9] add MPC837x MDS board default device tree

2007-10-23 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:10:43PM +0800, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: > Do we still need address-cell and size-cell even when it has no child > node? Maybe not *need*, but we do want it... it makes it less likely to be screwed up if someone adds a child node in the future. -Scott _

RE: [PATCH v6 resend 9/9] add MPC837x MDS board default device tree

2007-10-18 Thread Li Yang-r58472
> -Original Message- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:02 PM > To: Li Yang-r58472 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 resend 9/9] add MPC837x MDS board > default device tree >

Re: [PATCH v6 resend 9/9] add MPC837x MDS board default device tree

2007-10-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Li Yang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Fix a typo in previous one. > > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts | 282 ++ > + > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts | 264 ++ > +++ >

[PATCH v6 resend 9/9] add MPC837x MDS board default device tree

2007-10-18 Thread Li Yang
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Fix a typo in previous one. arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts | 282 +++ arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8378_mds.dts | 264 + arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8379_mds.dts | 300 +++