This patch implements a device-tree-only machine driver for Freescale
i.MX series Soc. It works with spdif_transmitter/spdif_receiver and
fsl_spdif.c drivers.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen b42...@freescale.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt | 29 +
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
This patch implements a device-tree-only machine driver for Freescale
i.MX series Soc. It works with spdif_transmitter/spdif_receiver and
fsl_spdif.c drivers.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen b42...@freescale.com
---
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string? In
either case I don't see why the compatible string doesn't give the
driver enough to have a sensible value.
I'm confused as to why we need this. The phrase
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string? In
either case I don't see why the compatible string doesn't give the
driver enough to have
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
At least they are separate drivers as I mentioned in the commit comments.
I'm not sure that the boundary of Linux drivers should necessarily
determine the way we carve up the description of IP blocks, though
presumably it's a
Am Montag, den 19.08.2013, 11:01 +0100 schrieb Mark Rutland:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:24:58AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string? In
either case I don't see
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
The phrase user-visible is being used in many current docs, I don't
dare to change it unless a sage gives me a suggestion.
I can see that there is entrenched usage,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:21:06AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
At least they are separate drivers as I mentioned in the commit comments.
I'm not sure that the boundary of Linux drivers should necessarily
determine the way we
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:50:43AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
The phrase user-visible is being used in many current docs, I don't
dare to change it unless a sage
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:31:21PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
This is intended to allow userspace to distinguish between systems that
are electrically identical but physically distinct, for example when
multiple systems are
10 matches
Mail list logo