On Mon, 15 May 2017, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 May 2017 05:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Update the cpumask with the target cpu and
> > > + * migrate the context if needed
> > > + */
> > > + if (target >= 0 &&
Sorry for delayed response.
On Wednesday 10 May 2017 05:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
+/*
+ * nest_init : Initializes the nest imc engine for the current chip.
+ * by default the nest engine is disabled.
+ */
+static void nest_init(int *cpu_opal_rc)
+
On Friday 12 May 2017 09:03 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Stewart Smith writes:
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this
On Friday 12 May 2017 07:48 AM, Stewart Smith wrote:
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
S
Stewart Smith writes:
> Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
>>> * in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
>>>than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
>>>OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
>>
>> So, init call will
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
>> * in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
>>than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
>>OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
>
> So, init call will return OPAL_PARAMETER for the u
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> wrote:
> >
> > > +static void nest_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0;
> > > + (per_nest_pmu_arr[i] != NULL) && (i
Hi,
On Wed, 10 May 2017 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
>
> > +static void nest_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0;
> > +(per_nest_pmu_arr[i] != NULL) && (i < IMC_MAX_PMUS); i++)
> > + perf_pmu_migrate_contex
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> +/*
> + * nest_init : Initializes the nest imc engine for the current chip.
> + * by default the nest engine is disabled.
> + */
> +static void nest_init(int *cpu_opal_rc)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /*
> + * OPAL figures out which CPU to start
Daniel Axtens writes:
>> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
>> index 62d240e..51dff54 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
>> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ enum cpuhp_st
Hi Daniel,
On Monday 08 May 2017 07:42 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had a look at the
patches on th
On Monday 08 May 2017 07:42 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Thanks to mpe for suggesting this. :)
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had a look at the
patches on that side:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return someth
Adds cpumask attribute to be used by each IMC pmu. Only one cpu (any
online CPU) from each chip for nest PMUs is designated to read counters.
On CPU hotplug, dying CPU is checked to see whether it is one of the
designated cpus, if yes, next online cpu from the same chip (for nest
units) is designa
14 matches
Mail list logo
