Hi Jean,
What is the preferred way to do this?
I still have to think about it. I didn't have much time to work on this
during the last 2 weeks, hopefully I will fine some time to experiment
again soon. As I underlined before, my patch set affects no less than 5
subsystems with different
Hi Jochen,
Firstly, you should probably cc Dave Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
anything in drivers/of as Sparc is the other user of this stuff (just in
case they are interested).
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:46:41 +0100 Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ b/drivers/of/i2c.c
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
Hi Olof,
And even if you DO decide to go that route, guess what? You need a
translation table just as with (3) anyway!
True.
3. use a glue layer with a translation map.
In my opinion this is an OK solution since the same information has to
be added somewhere already anyway -- eiither to
Hi Olof,
2. record the I2c name in the dts tree, either as seperate tag (like
linux,i2c-name=i2c-name)
or as additional compatible entry (like compatible=...,
linux,i2c-name).
I have to say no on this one. The device tree is not supposed to know
about how linux uses devices, there
On 2/22/08, Jochen Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jean,
+/*
+ * Wait for patch from Jon Smirl
+ * #include powerpc-common.h
+ */
It doesn't make sense to merge this comment upstream.
I know you don't like the patch from Jon Smirl and you also explained your
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:16:30PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Hi Olof,
2. record the I2c name in the dts tree, either as seperate tag (like
linux,i2c-name=i2c-name)
or as additional compatible entry (like compatible=...,
linux,i2c-name).
I have to say no on this one.
Hi Jochen,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:16:16 +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Hi Jean,
+/*
+ * Wait for patch from Jon Smirl
+ * #include powerpc-common.h
+ */
It doesn't make sense to merge this comment upstream.
I know you don't like the patch from Jon Smirl and you also explained
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Fortunately, I2c no longer uses numeric device IDs but names. So what are the
alternatives?
1. modify the I2c subsystem to accept OF names additionally to I2c names
(proposed by Jon smirl).
Sounds like Jean isn't very
Hallo Jochen,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:54:01 +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Using the port of 2.4 code from Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the actual algorithm used by the i2c driver of the DBox code on
cvs.tuxboc.org from Tmbinc, Gillem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Renamed i2c-rpx.c and
Using the port of 2.4 code from Vitaly Bordug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the actual algorithm used by the i2c driver of the DBox code on
cvs.tuxboc.org from Tmbinc, Gillem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Renamed i2c-rpx.c and
i2c-algo-8xx.c to i2c-cpm.c and converted the driver to an
of_platform_driver.
10 matches
Mail list logo