> > @@ -879,11 +891,18 @@
> > prev = NULL;
> > while ((rlen -= np * sizeof(unsigned int)) >= 0) {
> > if (prev) {
> > - if (prev[0] == ranges[0] && prev[1] == ranges[1] &&
> > - (prev[2] + prev[na+4]) == ranges[2] &&
> > -
Hello Valentine,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:07:54 +0400
Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Currently pci_32 doesn't support 64-bit physical addresses, while
> PowerPC440 platform has PCI space typically mapped above 4GB range.
> The patch adds 64-bit physical address support to 32-bit PCI code
> in order to
Currently pci_32 doesn't support 64-bit physical addresses, while
PowerPC440 platform has PCI space typically mapped above 4GB range.
The patch adds 64-bit physical address support to 32-bit PCI code
in order to bring-up PCI on 44x platform.
Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Sep 18, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>>> Add 64-bit physical address support to PCI.
>> Can you expand on your commit message. for example why do this?
>> is it address a bug fix, etc..
>>>
>>> Signe
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>
>> Add 64-bit physical address support to PCI.
>
> Can you expand on your commit message. for example why do this? is it
> address a bug fix, etc..
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
On Sep 18, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Add 64-bit physical address support to PCI.
Can you expand on your commit message. for example why do this? is
it address a bug fix, etc..
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c |
Add 64-bit physical address support to PCI.
Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/iomap.c |4 +--
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_32.c | 56 +--
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff -ruN linux-2.6.or
