On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:28 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:19:11 -0800
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi KAME,
As I mentioned while ago, ppc64 does not export information about
system RAM in /proc/iomem. Looking at the code and usage
scenerios I am
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:02:40 -0800
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul's concern is, since we didn't need it so far - why we need this
for hotplug memory remove to work ? It might break API for *unknown*
applications. Its unfortunate that, hotplug memory add updates
/proc/iomem. We
Hi KAME,
As I mentioned while ago, ppc64 does not export information about
system RAM in /proc/iomem. Looking at the code and usage
scenerios I am not sure what its really serving. Could you
explain what its purpose how the range can be invalid ?
At least on ppc64, all the memory ranges we get
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:28:46 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ioresource was good structure for remembering which memory is conventional
memory and i386/x86_64/ia64 registered conventional memory as System RAM,
when I posted patch. (just say System Ram is not for memory
