"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes:
> On 8/12/21 6:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Puvichakravarthy Ramachandran" writes:
With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
commit
On 8/12/21 6:19 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
"Puvichakravarthy Ramachandran" writes:
With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb
"Puvichakravarthy Ramachandran" writes:
>> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
>> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
>> commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and
>> memory freeing parts")
> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the
kernel
> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
> commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and
memory freeing parts")
> This results in the kernel issuing a high
> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the
kernel
> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
> commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and
memory freeing parts")
> This results in the kernel issuing a high
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 04:39:44PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> For that matter, I wonder if we shouldn't do something like this
> (untested) so the low level batch flush has visibility to the high
> level flush range.
>
> x86 could use this too AFAIKS, just needs to pass the range a bit
>
Nicholas Piggin writes:
> Excerpts from Aneesh Kumar K.V's message of August 4, 2021 12:37 am:
>> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
>> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
>> commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split
Excerpts from Nicholas Piggin's message of August 4, 2021 3:14 pm:
> Excerpts from Aneesh Kumar K.V's message of August 4, 2021 12:37 am:
>> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
>> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
>>
Excerpts from Aneesh Kumar K.V's message of August 4, 2021 12:37 am:
> With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
> will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
> commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and
>
With shared mapping, even though we are unmapping a large range, the kernel
will force a TLB flush with ptl lock held to avoid the race mentioned in
commit 1cf35d47712d ("mm: split 'tlb_flush_mmu()' into tlb flushing and memory
freeing parts")
This results in the kernel issuing a high number of
10 matches
Mail list logo
