Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc/papr_scm: Implement scm async flush

2020-12-01 Thread Pankaj Gupta
> >> Tha patch implements SCM async-flush hcall and sets the > >> ND_REGION_ASYNC capability when the platform device tree > >> has "ibm,async-flush-required" set. > > > > So, you are reusing the existing ND_REGION_ASYNC flag for the > > hypercall based async flush with device tree discovery? > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc/papr_scm: Implement scm async flush

2020-12-01 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
On 12/1/20 6:17 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: Tha patch implements SCM async-flush hcall and sets the ND_REGION_ASYNC capability when the platform device tree has "ibm,async-flush-required" set. So, you are reusing the existing ND_REGION_ASYNC flag for the hypercall based async flush with device tree

Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc/papr_scm: Implement scm async flush

2020-12-01 Thread Pankaj Gupta
> Tha patch implements SCM async-flush hcall and sets the > ND_REGION_ASYNC capability when the platform device tree > has "ibm,async-flush-required" set. So, you are reusing the existing ND_REGION_ASYNC flag for the hypercall based async flush with device tree discovery? Out of curiosity, does v

[RFC PATCH] powerpc/papr_scm: Implement scm async flush

2020-12-01 Thread Shivaprasad G Bhat
Tha patch implements SCM async-flush hcall and sets the ND_REGION_ASYNC capability when the platform device tree has "ibm,async-flush-required" set. The below demonstration shows the map_sync behavior when ibm,async-flush-required is present in device tree. (https://github.com/avocado-framework-te