[RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-03 Thread Mihai Caraman
Mihai Caraman (6): KVM: PPC: Book3E: Fix AltiVec interrupt numbers and build breakage KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling KVM: PPC: Book3E: Rename IRQPRIO names to accommodate ALTIVEC KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add AltiVec support KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add ONE_REG AltiVec support KVM: PP

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-04 Thread Scott Wood
On 06/03/2013 03:54:22 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote: Mihai Caraman (6): KVM: PPC: Book3E: Fix AltiVec interrupt numbers and build breakage KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling KVM: PPC: Book3E: Rename IRQPRIO names to accommodate ALTIVEC KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add AltiVec support KVM:

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-05 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> -Original Message- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:39 AM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Alexander Graf > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM:

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-05 Thread Scott Wood
abs.org; Alexander Graf > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support > > On 06/03/2013 03:54:22 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote: > > Mihai Caraman (6): > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Fix AltiVec interrupt numbers and build breakage > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refacto

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-06 Thread Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> > > This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines like > > > "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make > > Linus > > > happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/242896/ for 3.10. Then for 3.11, > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support

2013-06-06 Thread Scott Wood
On 06/06/2013 04:42:44 AM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote: > > > This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines like > > > "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make > > Linus > > > happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply > > > http://