On 31.01.2014, at 23:17, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 31.01.2014, at 11:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Alexander Graf writes:
>>>
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> We definitely don't need t
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 31.01.2014, at 11:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V
> wrote:
>
> > Alexander Graf writes:
> >
> >> On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>> We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
> >>> are hy
On 31.01.2014, at 11:38, Aneesh Kumar K.V
wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
>>> are hypervisor resource.
>>
>> This patch description doesn't cover what the patch actu
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
>> are hypervisor resource.
>
> This patch description doesn't cover what the patch actually does. It
> changes the implementation from "always tell t
On 01/28/2014 05:44 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
This patch description doesn't cover what the patch actually does. It
changes the implementation from "always tell the guest it uses 100%" to
"give th
We definitely don't need to emulate mtspr, because both the registers
are hypervisor resource.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s.h | 2 --
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 16
arch/pow
